Maternal mood, body image, and eating habits predict changes in feeding practices during the COVID-19 pandemic

Maternal mood and eating habits are associated with food parenting practices, including non-responsive feeding practices, which in turn impact children's eating habits. The COVID-19 pandemic may have negatively impacted maternal mood due to the overall stress and challenges, contributing to changes in eating behaviors and food parenting practices. The present study examined how maternal mood, body image, and eating concerns were related to perceived changes in feeding practices during the pandemic. A total of 137 mothers participated in an online study. Participants retrospectively reported their mood, eating habits, body dissatisfaction, and non-responsive feeding practices, before and during the pandemic, and responded to open-ended questions regarding changes in eating and feeding patterns during the pandemic. Results suggested differences in non-responsive feeding practices, including higher use of food as a reward for behavior and lower use of standard meal settings during the pandemic. In addition, significant relationships were found between higher maternal stress and higher body dissatisfaction (r = 0.37;p < .01), restrained eating (r = 31;p < .01), emotional eating (r = 0.44;p < .01), and higher use of overt and covert restriction retrospectively and during the pandemic. Results revealed trends in the same direction for depression and anxiety. Finally, qualitative findings were consistent with the quantitative findings, suggesting relationships between maternal mood, eating habits, and feeding practices. These results provide support for previous findings suggesting that the pandemic negatively impacted maternal well-being, increasing the use of some non-responsive feeding practices. Further work exploring the impacts of the pandemic on well-being, child feeding, and eating patterns is warranted.

Can everyone hear me? Reflections on the use of global online workshops for promoting inclusive knowledge generation

Online research methods have risen in popularity over recent decades, particularly in the wake of COVID-19. We conducted five online workshops capturing the experiences of participatory health researchers in relation to power, as part of a collaborative project to develop global knowledge systems on power in participatory health research. These workshops included predominantly academic researchers working in 24 countries across Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Here, we reflect on the opportunities, limitations, and key considerations of using online workshops for knowledge generation and shared learning. The online workshop approach offers the potential for cross-continental knowledge exchange and for the amplification of global South voices. However, this study highlights the need for deeper exploration of power dynamics exposed by online platform use, particularly the ‘digital divide' between academic partners and community co-researchers. Further research is needed to better understand the role of online platforms in generating more inclusive knowledge systems.

Effects of COVID-19 Financial and Social Hardships on Infants' and Toddlers' Development in the ECHO Program.

BACKGROUND: The financial hardships and social isolation experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic have been found to adversely affect children's developmental outcomes. While many studies thus far have focused on school-aged children and the pandemic-related impacts on their academic skills and behavior problems, relatively less is known about pandemic hardships and associations with children's development during their early years. Using a racially and economically diverse sample, we examined whether hardships experienced during the pandemic were associated with children's development with a particular focus on communication and socioemotional development. METHODS: Participants from eight cohorts of the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes program provided data on pandemic-related financial and social hardships as well as child developmental outcomes. Financial hardship was defined as at least one parent experiencing job loss or change, and social hardship was defined as families' quarantining from household members or extended family and friends. The development of children under 4 was assessed longitudinally, before and during the pandemic (N = 684), using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). The Generalized Estimating Equations, which accounted for within-child correlation, were used for analysis. RESULTS: Families from minority backgrounds and low socioeconomic status disproportionately experienced pandemic-related hardships. Male children had higher odds of experiencing negative changes in communication and personal social skills from pre- to during-pandemic visits (ORs ranged between 2.24 and 3.03 in analysis with binary ASQ outcomes and ranged from -0.34-0.36 in analyses with ASQ z-scores, ps = 0.000). Pandemic-related hardships in the social and financial areas did not explain within-individual changes in children's developmental outcomes. CONCLUSION: Negative developmental changes from pre- to during-pandemic were found in boys, yet we did not find any associations between increased experience of pandemic-related hardships and children's development. E how pandemic hardships affect development using a larger sample size and with longer follow-up is warranted.

Can everyone hear me? Reflections on the use of global online workshops for promoting inclusive knowledge generation

Online research methods have risen in popularity over recent decades, particularly in the wake of COVID-19. We conducted five online workshops capturing the experiences of participatory health researchers in relation to power, as part of a collaborative project to develop global knowledge systems on power in participatory health research. These workshops included predominantly academic researchers working in 24 countries across Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Here, we reflect on the opportunities, limitations, and key considerations of using online workshops for knowledge generation and shared learning. The online workshop approach offers the potential for cross-continental knowledge exchange and for the amplification of global South voices. However, this study highlights the need for deeper exploration of power dynamics exposed by online platform use, particularly the ?digital divide? between academic partners and community co-researchers. Further research is needed to better understand the role of online platforms in generating more inclusive knowledge systems.